Rochdale AFC enter the September 5 League Two fixture at the Crown Oil Arena as slight favorites in trader pricing due to home advantage and stronger recent home form following promotion from the National League. Gillingham’s injury crisis, including long-term absences for winger Kadeem Harris (ACL) and defender Liam Gordon, plus other squad disruptions, has limited attacking options and contributed to their slow start with just one point from two games. Both sides remain winless or near the bottom after early defeats, producing a tightly contested market where Rochdale’s 43.5% implied probability edges Gillingham’s 32% amid ongoing transfer activity and defensive vulnerabilities on both sides. Historical head-to-head results show mixed outcomes, underscoring the competitive balance reflected in the 29.5% draw probability.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedAll Sports
NFL
MLB
College Football
UFC
All
Premier League
LaLiga
Bundesliga
Serie A
Ligue 1
Club Friendlies
MLS
Categoría Primera A
K League 2
Chinese Super League
Eliteserien
Eredivisie
Allsvenskan
Taça de Portugal
Saudi Pro League
K League 1
Liga MX
Uruguayan Primera División
Brasileirão Série B
Primeira Liga
Brasileirão Série A
EFL Championship
Süper Lig
Ligue 2
National League
J2 League
USL League One
Ekstraklasa
DFB-Pokal
USL Championship
2. Bundesliga
J1 League
League of Ireland Premier Division
efbet Liga
Scottish Premiership
Categoría Primera B
Serie B
Primera Nacional
Liga de Primera
Danish Superliga
Ukrainian Premier League
Kazakhstan Premier League
SuperLiga
Superettan
China League One
UEFA Champions League
UEFA Europa League
Veikkausliiga
UEFA Conference League
Virslīga
LaLiga2
NWSL
Primera B (Chile)
Copa do Brasil
Belgium Pro League
Besta deild karla
ÖFB Cup
Austria Bundesliga
NB I
Eerste Divisie
Copa Argentina
Copa Sudamericana
Scotland League Cup
Egyptian Premier League
OBOS-ligaen
Niké liga
UEFA Women's Champions League
Liga Nacional de Guatemala
Brasileirão Série C
Serbian SuperLiga
Turkey 1. Lig
Chance Liga
Slovenia PrvaLiga
Qatar Stars League
LigaPro Serie A
League Two
Uzbekistan Super League
Swiss Super League
League One
Greece Super League
Australia Cup
Israeli Premier League
Premium Liiga
Liga 1
A Lyga
Challenger Pro League
Prva Liga
Liga FPD
TFF Süper Kupa
UAE Pro League
Betri deildin
Coppa Italia
A-League Men
Liga Profesional de Fútbol
EFL CUP
KNVB Beker
Bolivian Primera División
Botola Pro
Leagues Cup
Copa Libertadores
South Africa Premiership
ASEAN Championship
Hockey
Cycling
Poker
Chess
Pickleball
Volleyball
Esports
Rochdale AFC – Gillingham FC
Moneyline
Reg Time$0 Vol.
Spreads
Reg Time$0 Vol.
Totals
Reg Time$0 Vol.
Both Teams to Score?
Reg Time$0 Vol.
First Team to Score
Reg Time$0 Vol.
Rochdale AFC Totals
Reg Time$0 Vol.
Gillingham FC Totals
Reg Time$0 Vol.
If Rochdale AFC wins, this market will resolve to "Yes".
Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No".
This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time.
The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, data from Flashscore may be used; if Flashscore data is unavailable, data from Sofascore may be used; if neither is available, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead. All markets will settle based on the official final result as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. Revisions to officially declared final scores made after market resolution will not be accounted for in determining the outcome.
Market Opened: Aug 23, 2026, 5:15 AM ET
Resolution Source
https://www.efl.com/Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Rochdale AFC – Gillingham FC
Moneyline
Reg Time$0 Vol.
Spreads
Reg Time$0 Vol.
Totals
Reg Time$0 Vol.
Both Teams to Score?
Reg Time$0 Vol.
First Team to Score
Reg Time$0 Vol.
Rochdale AFC Totals
Reg Time$0 Vol.
Gillingham FC Totals
Reg Time$0 Vol.
If Rochdale AFC wins, this market will resolve to "Yes".
Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No".
This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time.
The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, data from Flashscore may be used; if Flashscore data is unavailable, data from Sofascore may be used; if neither is available, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead. All markets will settle based on the official final result as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. Revisions to officially declared final scores made after market resolution will not be accounted for in determining the outcome.
Market Opened: Aug 23, 2026, 5:15 AM ET
Resolution Source
https://www.efl.com/Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Rochdale AFC enter the September 5 League Two fixture at the Crown Oil Arena as slight favorites in trader pricing due to home advantage and stronger recent home form following promotion from the National League. Gillingham’s injury crisis, including long-term absences for winger Kadeem Harris (ACL) and defender Liam Gordon, plus other squad disruptions, has limited attacking options and contributed to their slow start with just one point from two games. Both sides remain winless or near the bottom after early defeats, producing a tightly contested market where Rochdale’s 43.5% implied probability edges Gillingham’s 32% amid ongoing transfer activity and defensive vulnerabilities on both sides. Historical head-to-head results show mixed outcomes, underscoring the competitive balance reflected in the 29.5% draw probability.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedBeware of external links.
Beware of external links.


Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions