Trader sentiment around which Valorant players will depart their current rosters by year-end centers on contract situations, recent Stage 2 and international tournament form, and organizational roster needs ahead of the 2026–27 cycle. Elevated probabilities for names like Demon1 and Primmie stem from strong individual showings that could trigger buyout interest or mutual partings, while teams in rebuild mode weigh salary-cap flexibility and regional roster rules. Cross-regional transfers remain a key variable for international talent due to visa and import restrictions, and uncertainty persists around which organizations will pursue aggressive changes versus stability. Historical patterns show that late-summer performance spikes and upcoming VCT qualifiers often accelerate roster movement decisions.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedPrimmie
58%
f0rsaken
51%
Jawgemo
51%
D4v41
50%
Jinggg
50%
something
50%
BuZz
50%
valyn
50%
Skuba
50%
Cryocells
49%
leaf
49%
invy
31%
kiNgg
17%
brawk
16%
Sato
50%
Meteor
49%
Jemkin
35%
Asuna
51%
Demon1
51%
trent
49%
$2,767 Vol.
Primmie
58%
f0rsaken
51%
Jawgemo
51%
D4v41
50%
Jinggg
50%
something
50%
BuZz
50%
valyn
50%
Skuba
50%
Cryocells
49%
leaf
49%
invy
31%
kiNgg
17%
brawk
16%
Sato
50%
Meteor
49%
Jemkin
35%
Asuna
51%
Demon1
51%
trent
49%
For the purpose of this market, the listed player is considered to have "left" if they are officially removed from the listed team's active roster — including a transfer to another team, release, benching to inactive/reserve, loan to another team, retirement, or any other departure from the active lineup — as reflected on the team's Liquipedia page (https://liquipedia.net/valorant). The player being a stand-in for another team while still rostered does not by itself count.
The change must occur on or before the deadline and be reflected in the resolution source. Once the departure appears in the resolution source, it must remain in effect for at least 48 continuous hours to be valid. This 48-hour period may finish after the deadline, so long as the departure itself occurred on or before the deadline. If the change is reverted before 48 hours have elapsed, it will not count toward resolution.
A name change or alias referring to the same player on the same team does not count as leaving. Temporary absence for a single match (with the player remaining on the roster) does not count.
If the listed team disbands, or the listed player and the team part ways because the roster is dissolved, this will count as the player leaving and resolve "Yes".
The primary resolution source for this market will be Liquipedia; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Market Opened: Aug 6, 2026, 11:45 AM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the purpose of this market, the listed player is considered to have "left" if they are officially removed from the listed team's active roster — including a transfer to another team, release, benching to inactive/reserve, loan to another team, retirement, or any other departure from the active lineup — as reflected on the team's Liquipedia page (https://liquipedia.net/valorant). The player being a stand-in for another team while still rostered does not by itself count.
The change must occur on or before the deadline and be reflected in the resolution source. Once the departure appears in the resolution source, it must remain in effect for at least 48 continuous hours to be valid. This 48-hour period may finish after the deadline, so long as the departure itself occurred on or before the deadline. If the change is reverted before 48 hours have elapsed, it will not count toward resolution.
A name change or alias referring to the same player on the same team does not count as leaving. Temporary absence for a single match (with the player remaining on the roster) does not count.
If the listed team disbands, or the listed player and the team part ways because the roster is dissolved, this will count as the player leaving and resolve "Yes".
The primary resolution source for this market will be Liquipedia; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader sentiment around which Valorant players will depart their current rosters by year-end centers on contract situations, recent Stage 2 and international tournament form, and organizational roster needs ahead of the 2026–27 cycle. Elevated probabilities for names like Demon1 and Primmie stem from strong individual showings that could trigger buyout interest or mutual partings, while teams in rebuild mode weigh salary-cap flexibility and regional roster rules. Cross-regional transfers remain a key variable for international talent due to visa and import restrictions, and uncertainty persists around which organizations will pursue aggressive changes versus stability. Historical patterns show that late-summer performance spikes and upcoming VCT qualifiers often accelerate roster movement decisions.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated



Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions