The Justice Department reportedly opened a perjury inquiry in May 2026 into statements E. Jean Carroll made during 2022 depositions in her civil suits against President Trump, centering on whether she accurately described outside legal funding from a nonprofit tied to Reid Hoffman. U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros for the Northern District of Illinois promptly denied that any criminal investigation targets Carroll herself, clarifying that related scrutiny appears focused on the funding entity rather than her testimony. No charges have been filed, and perjury prosecutions in civil litigation remain rare and fact-intensive. The $5 million verdict stands after the Supreme Court declined review in June 2026, while appeals continue on the separate $83.3 million defamation judgment. Trader consensus on federal charges reflects these procedural barriers, the official denial, and the administration’s broader pattern of reviewing litigation funding in high-profile cases.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedDecember 31
36%
$1,166 Vol.
December 31
36%
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from US governmental sources, however a wide consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Market Opened: Jul 31, 2026, 5:44 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from US governmental sources, however a wide consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The Justice Department reportedly opened a perjury inquiry in May 2026 into statements E. Jean Carroll made during 2022 depositions in her civil suits against President Trump, centering on whether she accurately described outside legal funding from a nonprofit tied to Reid Hoffman. U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros for the Northern District of Illinois promptly denied that any criminal investigation targets Carroll herself, clarifying that related scrutiny appears focused on the funding entity rather than her testimony. No charges have been filed, and perjury prosecutions in civil litigation remain rare and fact-intensive. The $5 million verdict stands after the Supreme Court declined review in June 2026, while appeals continue on the separate $83.3 million defamation judgment. Trader consensus on federal charges reflects these procedural barriers, the official denial, and the administration’s broader pattern of reviewing litigation funding in high-profile cases.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated



Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions